Hello Eric: On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 1:35 PM, Eric S Fraga <ucec...@ucl.ac.uk> wrote:
> I am surprised, however, at this comment: > >> Gnuplot was ok when I didn't need quailty graphs. > > in what way does gnuplot fall short in terms of quality? (but keep > this part of the conversatino off-list please to avoid annoying others) I don't have a great deal to say about this, so I will keep my remarks on the list. I needed/wanted a tool to produce publication quality graphs. Gnuplot is great, and I have used it in the past, to make tide graphs. In my experience, controls of the details of the graph were less accessible to me, and the graphs I produced were pretty rough edged. GRI has worked very well for me for monthly tide graph calendars, with good control of parameters. GNUPLOT is fantastic for quick, and what I felt were rough and ready plots. GRI is easily installed on Ubuntu installs, and a gri mode for emacs makes it easier. I will try the suggestions you made to work out a babel solution for gri plots. Thanks for the suggestions, Alan _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
