Eric Schulte <schulte.eric <at> gmail.com> writes: > The following function might get part way towards what you describe. > > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > (defun org-send-email-of-headline () > (interactive) > (let ((subject (org-get-heading t)) > (to (org-entry-get (point) "mailto"))) > (outline-mark-subtree) > (org-mime-org-buffer-htmlize) > (save-excursion > (message-goto-to) (insert to) > (message-goto-subject) (insert subject)))) > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- >
Indeed! This gets me very close to what I had in mind. Aside from saying thanks, I have two related things to say: 1) The code snippet above (really org-mime-org-buffer-htmlize) produces output which is either designed to be further processed by the mml library (mml-generate-mime) for gnus users or by the semi library for wanderlust users. Thus, the buffer resulting from the above code-snippet is still one step away from being something one could feed to smtpmail, and makes the output one needs to get from org-mime dependent on an MUA (gnus or wanderlust). 2) I don't see the reason for this dependence. Forget what mail client the user prefers, whether gnus or wanderlust or something else. Why not just feed the output of org-mime to a scratch buffer, run (mml-generate-mime) on that, stick the output in a message buffer, build a header, and then run smtpmail-send-it? 3) Okay, I see one reason for the dependence: I guess that mml isn't part of the base emacs distribution. 4) And I see another reason: if one wanted to edit the htmlized buffer it might be a little more convenient to work with the semi or mml representations instead of the mime. But (3) and (4) seem weak to me. What am I missing? -Ethan _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
