On 04/08/10 06:36, Bastien wrote: > Or we might also consider CC0: > > http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ > > It looks way more simple to me. > > It also circumvents the problem of people having to sign the FSF papers > if the Org/Emacs manuals include part of the code they contributed to > Worg as examples. > > What people think? > Hi Bastien,
The Software Freedom Law Centre has some good guidelines on licensing. Specificall you might want to look at: http://www.softwarefreedom.org/resources/2008/foss-primer.html#x1-120002.4 and http://www.softwarefreedom.org/resources/2007/gpl-non-gpl-collaboration.html Ian. _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
