Am 09.08.2010, 09:37 Uhr, schrieb Robert Klein <rokl...@roklein.de>:
Sorry dropped something on the keyboard and sent the message early :(
Am 09.08.2010, 08:28 Uhr, schrieb Carsten Dominik
<carsten.domi...@gmail.com>:
Nope, I am against this syntax. If we introduce a more general syntax,
then it should be done in the way Samuel proposed. WHich means
we firs get a keyword indtroducing the piece, and then properties.
Like
$[style :color red the red text]
or
$[face :color :italic t red the red text]
Something like the $ before "[" also would seem critical to disambiguate
from other uses of "[".
I'd prefer this kind of syntax, too. Btw, shouldn't the syntax be:
$[face :color red :italic t the red italic text]
?? (i.e. the red following the :color keyword, not the ':italic t')
I didn't find a canonical way to make a paragraph or a longer text
passage italic, so I'd love an easy way to get it.
BTW, if simply '$[' is free, why not use this for style, e.g.:
$[:italic t :bold nil :color teal My italic and teal text]
(sorry for the double mail)
Best regards
Robert
However, I am not too excited about extra syntax to get this kind of
thing.
Would not oppose it, but probably never use it.
- Carsten
_______________________________________________
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
