>>>>> Nick Dokos writes:
> OK, thanks for the pointer: makes sense. I hadn't pulled your
> reimplementation till just now. Of course, these functions didn't
> exist before, so there was no choice - but maybe the few places
> where org-next-item is used need to be examined and brought up to
> snuff, using your new functions? Even if not strictly necessary,
> then at least as examples of good practice for others to follow.
You are right: this should be done. Speed issues may happen otherwise.
I'll look into it on Sunday.
As an example,
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
(defun org-skip-over-state-notes ()
"Skip past the list of State notes in an entry."
(if (looking-at "\n[ \t]*- State") (forward-char 1))
(while (looking-at "[ \t]*- State")
(condition-case nil
(org-next-item)
(error (org-end-of-item)))))
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
would become
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
(defun org-skip-over-state-notes ()
"Skip past the list of State notes in an entry."
(if (looking-at "\n[ \t]*- State") (forward-char 1))
(if (looking-at "[ \t]*- State") (goto-char (org-list-bottom-point))))
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
_______________________________________________
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
