Aloha Thomas, "Thomas S. Dye" wrote: > While using the listings setup you sent to the list a while back, I found > this line and wondered why you chose not to break long lines? > > breaklines=false, %!! don't break long lines of code > > The !! in the comment led me to believe you might have some strong reasons.
You're right guessing that the !! do have a meaning. Yes, they mean: this is not a standard comment, that's something you really must be aware of... I guess I did that for 2 reasons: - be sure to easy locate what could be a wrong setting, in case I would not be happy with the listings results - emphasize on the importance of that setting. Now, why choosing this? First, let me tell you I'm sometimes a bit of a crazy perfectionist. I want the things to be perfectly output, and my reports to be of great quality on the presentation side as well -- I cannot easily judge on my own for the contents ;-) One of the constraints I use in my daily life is: no more than 80 rows in files, be it text (Org) or code (.emacs, bash scripts, etc.). In fact, even not more than 78, when possible. I have Emacs column markers in columns 78, 79 and 80, showing me when I reach the limits. I want my code in my files to be formatted in such a way as well, and have chosen the right font size (in LaTeX) so that my code is displayed in the LaTeX PDF with the biggest font possible, so that an 80-wide line is displayed on one line, within the normal allowed space. What about longer lines, then? Either I let LaTeX listings decide for me. Either I don't. I've explicitly chosen the second one, with the above setting in Listings. Why? Because I consider that lines longer than 80 characters are bad, and that *I* have to correct them somehow. I don't want to rest on Listings to rearrange my code. Plus, Listings does not do it good, if I remember good. The wrapped text never won't be placed in the way you would do it if you had to break the line yourself, explicitly. So, in a nutshell, by forbidding long lines to be wrapped by Listings, I have a clear indication that my code is too wide at some spots, and that I do have to cut it in a clean way, directly in the source. > I'm asking because I'm finding it difficult to configure the listings > package so it works perfectly. You're welcome. Do I answer your question in an understandable way? Just asking if I'm clear about *my* objectives; I can perfectly understand that others don't share this quite strict point of view. Best regards, Seb -- Sébastien Vauban _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
