Hello Bastien Bastien <bastien.gue...@wikimedia.fr> writes:
> Jambunathan K <kjambunat...@gmail.com> writes: > >> I have every reason to believe that upcoming version of Org would be >> tagged as 7.02. Earlier I had argued that version strings be >> version-to-list compatible. I would like to reiterate it. >> >> My real concern is that 7.02 would be deemed as equivalent to 7.2 >> internally by the versioning subsystem and this is likely to clash with >> user's point of view. A user would *definitely* assume 7.02 as different >> from 7.2 and in all probability swear that former is inferior to the >> later. >> >> Please confirm what I am saying by evalling this: >> >> #+begin_src emacs-lisp >> (version-list-= (version-to-list "7.02") (version-to-list "7.2")) >> #+end_src > > I confirm. > >> Ignore this mail if it is already taken care of. Needless to say, I have >> ELPA-tarballs in mind when I say this. > > Another way is to make Emacs more liberal about version names. > > Can you suggest a new default for `version-regexp-alist' so that > 7.01 is considered older than 7.10? I don't think I can sell this to emacs-devel with any success. It's not really worth it. I think I have made a sensible argument (or atleast recorded my opinion). I will leave things at that. > > (version-list-= (version-to-list "7.02") (version-to-list "7.2")) > being t is not intuitive. Jambunathan K. _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
