Sébastien Vauban <wxhgmqzgw...@spammotel.com> writes: [...]
>>> - Regarding LaTeX, my suggestion requires the =todonotes= LaTeX >>> package to be loaded in the header. >> >> For that one I'm not sure adding one more package to those already inserted >> by default is a good idea. Is =todonotes= standard in every LaTeX >> distribution? > > I think so, but what really is standard? > > With TeXLive, almost all existing packages are installed nowadays (you can't > not choose anymore for base or medium installation packages). So, yes, it's > directly available. > > With MikTeX, I have no idea. But MiKTeX pops up the user for missing packages, > allowing its installation in a couple of seconds. If not by default, shouldn't > be a problem either. > > >> I think default templates should be clean and very low on requirements. This >> is not too hard for an user of this (undocumented) feature of Org to >> configure it to its needs after all. > > I share your view on keeping trying to be as "basic" as possible in > requirements. Though, I must admit that, at the time when I only used pure > LaTeX for editing my stuff, the todonotes package appeared as the only > valuable one. > > And, as its name says, it really is targetting TODO notes! > > >> What do users (and maintainers) think about it? > > I'm interested as well by comments... I tend to ensure that all packages that are available are installed so this wouldn't be a problem for me. However, I think that keeping the number of dependencies down is advantageous so I would vote for having a very generic default template for latex but with a good example of what is possible in the documentation (e.g. the particular template definition proposed by Sébastien). -- : Eric S Fraga (GnuPG: 0xC89193D8FFFCF67D) in Emacs 23.2.1 : using Org-mode version 7.3 (release_7.3.104.gf692) _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
