Hi Eric, "Eric Schulte" wrote: > Sébastien Vauban <wxhgmqzgw...@spammotel.com> writes: >> "Eric Schulte" wrote: >>> I've just pushed up a new header argument combination ":comments noweb" >>> which will wrap all embedded noweb sections in link comments, as >>> demonstrated in the following example. Hopefully this should be >>> sufficient for a complete mapping from a pure code file back to the >>> original org-mode file. >> >> If I understand correctly, this is some sort of enhancement to the ":comments >> yes" option. >> >> If yes, is there a reason to have both values, with subtle differences? >> Shouldn't we port the behavior of ":comments noweb" to the ":comments yes" >> value? > > Yes, the reason to retain both variants is that in the case of short > noweb references embedded in a single line, e.g. > > #+source: first > #+begin_src ruby > 5 > #+end_src > > #+begin_src ruby :noweb yes > <<first>> + 6 > #+end_src > > the yes option would be preferable, as the insertion of comments around > the noweb reference would result in adding line breaks around the > reference and possibly breaking new-line sensitive code.
I see. I do second your choice... Best regards, Seb -- Sébastien Vauban _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode