Bastien <bastien.gue...@wikimedia.fr> writes: > Hi Alex, > > Alex Huang <a...@mit.edu> writes: > >> 3. current behavior: >> ( + is unsurprising, ! is surprising, ? is not sure whether to be >> surprised) >> + entries without time information not displayed >> + timestamps without text not displayed >> ! entries with timestamps display the text, but not the timestamp > > You used this: > > * TODO <2010-12-25 Sat 14:40>-<2010-12-25 Sat 14:50> range with todo > > which looks weird. > > Better to put the timestamp/range on the next line: > > * TODO range with todo > <2010-12-25 Sat 14:40>-<2010-12-25 Sat 14:50>
Shouldn't these timestamps have two dashes between them? <2010-12-25 Sat 14:40>--<2010-12-25 Sat 14:50> or <2010-12-25 Sat 14:40-14:50> ? -Bernt > > You won't get the surprising results you see. > > HTH, _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
