Hi Dan, Dan Davison <dandavis...@gmail.com> writes:
> Incidentally, I would suggest that org-current-export-file and > org-current-export-dir are renamed so that they are within the > org-export-* namespace. Agreed. Please provide a patch if you have time. > There are other areas of Org where I think the > naming should be standardised, notably in org-src.el: the distinction > between org-src-* and org-edit-src-* is unclear IMO. I leave this decision to Erik, this is *his* namespace :) > I think this is > kind of important, because in learning emacs one does makes use of these > namespace conventions, e.g. C-h v <initial-letters> TAB. I agree. > How much change > would there be if we demanded that *all* variables defined in org-foo.el > are named within the org-foo-* namespace? I don't know. Let's undertake this work progressively. -- Bastien _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
