Hi Nick and al., Nick Dokos wrote: >> This will at least help with the first difficulty -- and motivate all >> people working on the exporters to address the second one. The third one >> can be turned into a *chance*: that of having several people working in the >> same direction. > > Excellent plan! > > If nobody beats me to it, I'll send out an initial draft of such a table to > the list for comment over the weekend: not a complete thing, mind you - just > something partially covering one or two exporters. We can modify it as > necessary and then proceed to populate it over the next few weeks.
When discussing exporters and features, two things that come up to my mind as missing as a "general Org feature": - bibliography :: works for LaTeX[1], not for HTML export. - acronyms :: idem. Maybe those should be made available for general Org usage by making them somehow part of the preprocessing? Best regards, Seb Footnotes: [1] ... but "uglyfies" a bit (too much) the *visible* text. Ideally, such features should be hidden behind things like links or so. -- Sébastien Vauban
