On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 6:38 AM, Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaz...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > John Hendy <jw.he...@gmail.com> writes: > >> On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaz...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> John Hendy <jw.he...@gmail.com> writes: >>> >>>> Just stumbled across something very odd I can't figure out. Here's a >>>> sample: >>>> ,----- >>>> | #+OPTIONS: toc:t TeX:t LaTeX:t H:4 f:t todo:nil num:t tags:nil >>>> | #+latex_class: article >>>> | >>>> | * Section >>>> | 1. *A section*: a bunch of text is here and it seems like the >>>> footnote is doing >>>> | something odd. [fn:1] More text here. >>>> | 2. *A section*: a bunch of text is here and it seems like the >>>> footnote is doing >>>> | something odd. >>>> | >>>> | * Footnotes >>>> | [fn:1] www.google.com >>>> `----- >>>> >>>> It seems that the footnote triggers LaTeX to end the enumerate >>>> environment early for some reason. Not only that, but it seems to be >>>> inserting \end{enumerate} *inside* the footnote: >>>> ,----- >>>> | \begin{enumerate} >>>> | \item \textbf{A section}: a bunch of text is here and it seems like >>>> the footnote is doing >>>> | something odd. \footnote{www.google.com >>>> | \end{enumerate} >>>> | } More text here. >>>> | >>>> | \begin{enumerate} >>>> | \item \textbf{A section}: a bunch of text is here and it seems like >>>> the footnote is doing >>>> | something odd. >>>> | \end{enumerate} >>>> `----- >>>> >>>> Any suggestions? >>> >>> This has been discussed in a recent thread, and I submitted a patch for >>> that problem. I'm still waiting for feedback before applying it. >>> >> >> Whoops on missing that... though I hope it gets fixed. I hadn't >> updated one of my computers in a few months and know it wasn't giving >> the bad behavior on there, so a change must have goofed something. > > I've pushed the patch. I tried it on your example and it seems to behave > correctly. Though, do not hesitate to report back if any problem arises. >
Yay! Flawless victory (well, for this simple example). Many thanks, John > Regards, > > -- > Nicolas Goaziou >