No, this is expected (if possibly under-documented behavior). The
:results header arguments are associated with the code block and *not*
with the #+call line. To get the desired behavior, you must specify the
:results header argument on the #+call: line thusly.
#+call: print_list(lst=list1) :results output org
Best -- Eric
Hi,
I recently made the same mistake, and it took me a while to figure
things out. I had assumed #+CALLs inherited all the header arguments
from the code blocks they referenced.
Regarding documentation, I see now that the correct behavior is at
least implicitly documented in the first example at
[[info:org#Header%20arguments%20in%20function%20calls]].
It might rate an explicit explanation at
[[info:org#Evaluating%20code%20blocks]] as well, though.
Yours,
Christian
