Hi Sébastien, "Sebastien Vauban" <wxhgmqzgw...@spammotel.com> writes:
>> * !TODO This would be an inline task, not a headline > > I've no clear cut opinion on this right now. Maybe yes, maybe not. :) > Though, there are differences between inline tasks and headlines: Yep, I know the differences. I'm talking about the way they _look_. So many asterisks looks cumbersome to mee, and I'd favor a non-intrusive syntax like the one proposed above. My question was: what is the rationale behind using so many asterisks? I can think of three things: 1. people want inline tasks with possibly no TODO keyword 2. people prefer to detect them *very easily* 3. changing the syntax of inline tasks from changing todos (like !TODO) is too complicated code-wise My proposal is this: - enforce the use of TODO keywords in inline tasks (wrt 1) - make a special face for inline tasks (wrt 2) > Your proposition would be (very) nice when we don't have to link a > note to the task. My change would affect the content you can add to inline tasks and the way they are treated by exporters. > All such questions certainly merit more attention. Sure -- thanks for your input! -- Bastien
