> So "frustrated" is a dirty word for you? How about "a conceited > moron"?
Labels have no meanings. They are merely quick conveniences. (Does this remark make me a MORE CONCEITED MORON) > Bastien might be an incompetent maintainer or programmer (in any case, > you seem to be the first to make such claims) I use words judiciously. I made no mention of incompetence. I was only listing the expectations that I have of him and where I felt he seriously falls short. If I say that I am a professional programmer will that make Bastien a poor programmer. Did you ever have a course in logic? > You've shown more than once here that you're rather incompetent as a > contributor and a person[1]. I am a incompetent contributor to Orgmode if you measure my competence (or incompetence thereof) based on say how many miles I can manage to run in a marathon. You are conveniently ignoring good things that people are saying about org-odt just because you are in ill-mood. Advising a person to refrain from posting after bringing attention to the fact that contrary to his intention he seriously falls short is according to me not unkind. If you force a sick person to sit when it could harm him are you helping him or you harming him. I don't want to confront you with a Zen koan but your reasoning is seriously flawed and your intent is malicious. Btw, if I am dog will org-odt be less useful? > I find it quite surprising that people on this list, including Bastien, > are even willing to reply to the dirt you're spitting up. > > [1] Another example of the Jambunathan style: > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/42544/focus=42563 --
