Hi Rainer, Rainer M Krug wrote: >> While thinking about all of this, and working in real-life documents, I >> just >> came back to a suggestion which I made some time ago. It goes about this >> enhancement: >> >> Would it be possible to specify "buffer-wide language specific" header >> arguments? >> >> That is, be able to say: >> >> "In this document, I want to: >> - tangle all my .sql chunks, but no other; >> - eval all the elisp chunks with query, but no other." >> >> Something we could write quite easily along the lines: >> >> #+PROPERTY: tangle no >> #+PROPERTY: eval never >> #+PROPERTY[SQL]: tangle yes >> #+PROPERTY[EMACS-LISP]: eval query >> >> (the syntax used here is just a draft sample!) >> >> What do you think about this feature? If you feel it can be something >> interesting to have, this is surely to incorporate in the current syntax >> debate. If not... never mind. > > I am not Eric, but I think that would be a good idea.
Thanks for your comments. > Bu there needs to be a way of specifying more then one property, either > by #+PROPERTY+: or by any other way -I acually luike the #+PROPERTY+: . > Thinking about it, it should be possible without the +: > > #+PROPERTY[R]: tangle no > #+PROPERTY[R]: export both Yes, no need for a "+" here, as the lines do target different properties (in this case, "tangle" and "export"). > The more I see it, the more I like it - also the [] In fact, the lines without any language specification would be, at least semantically, equivalent to something like this: #+PROPERTY[*]: tangle no #+PROPERTY[*]: eval never Best regards, Seb -- Sebastien Vauban