Chong Yidong wrote: > This uses the Emacs executable on the exec path, which might not be the > correct one.
Yes; I wondered if (car command-line-args) was a reliable way to find the actual name of the running Emacs binary?
Chong Yidong wrote: > This uses the Emacs executable on the exec path, which might not be the > correct one.
Yes; I wondered if (car command-line-args) was a reliable way to find the actual name of the running Emacs binary?