According to this discussion on the mailing list, http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/48571 , this is a known bug.
I fixed this by loading "org-compat" after requiring org-mode from git, just like Sebastian said. -- Kenny Meyer On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 12:05 PM, Nick Dokos <nicholas.do...@hp.com> wrote: > Nick Dokos <nicholas.do...@hp.com> wrote: > >> Kenny Meyer <knny.m...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > I am getting the same message here upon calling various org-functions >> > (e.g.: org-drill, org-submit-bug-report), since I have compiled >> > org-mode from git, but I am not sure where exactly the error was >> > introduced. >> > >> > > Explicitly Loading `org-compat' does cure this problem... >> > Requiring org-compat does not fix that here. >> > Can you tell me where exactly you loaded org-compat? >> > >> > Org-mode version 7.7 (release_7.7.617.gb1f2) >> > GNU Emacs 24.0.50.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.2.0) of >> > 2011-09-29 >> > >> > -- >> > Kenny Meyer >> > >> >> IIRC, the cure for macro problems like this is to >> > > Sorry - I thought it was a macro but it isn't. Nevertheless, > the note below still stands. > > Nick > >> make clean >> make >> >> (alternatively, make clean and just use uncompiled code). There might be >> something missing to cause it, but I don't think so in this case: I >> tried a minimal .emacs with the same version as above (Org-mode version >> 7.7 (release_7.7.617.gb1f2) and I can start, goto the active clock and >> stop it with no errors. >> >> Nick >> >> >> > >> > >> > On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Sebastien Vauban >> > <wxhgmqzgw...@spammotel.com> wrote: >> > > Hello, >> > > >> > > In conditions which I consider unchanged (I speak of my emacs config >> > > file), >> > > with the latest Org-mode version, I now have the message: >> > > >> > > let*: Symbol's function definition is void: >> > > org-pop-to-buffer-same-window >> > > >> > > when doing, for example, `C-c C-x C-j' to jump on the currently clocked >> > > item. >> > > >> > > Explicitly Loading `org-compat' does cure this problem... But we must >> > > miss a >> > > `require' somewhere, but where? In `org.el' itself? >> > > >> > > Best regards, >> > > Seb >> > > >> > > -- >> > > Sebastien Vauban >> > > >> > > >> > >>