Bernt Hansen <be...@norang.ca> writes: > pin...@iro.umontreal.ca (François Pinard) writes:
>> todo-dependencies should likely never be enforced for repeated >> entries, even if enforced otherwise, as enforcing for repetitions >> with the current Org mechanics has no meaning, at least as I >> undestand Org so far. > You can set a NOBLOCKING property to t to skip the dependency check for > repeated tasks. > * TODO Some Repeating Task > SCHEDULED: <2011-12-16 Fri 15:30 ++1w> > :PROPERTY: > :NOBLOCKING: t > :END: Thanks for the hint, Bernt. I'll use it for now. I still think this is a work around a real problem, which would ideally be corrected. Regardless of blocking being configured or not for non-repeating tasks, repeated tasks should never be blocked, shouldn't they? François
