On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 10:59 AM, John Hendy <jw.he...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 9:01 PM, John Hendy <jw.he...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 6:03 PM, Chris Malone <chris.m.mal...@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> Hi John, >>> >>> I'm not sure what Org mode is doing behind the scenes, but I suspect >>> something is getting muddled because you specify both the src block file >>> header /and/ the output terminal in the gnu plot code. >>> >>> Perhaps a simpler solution - if you indeed want Postscript images - >>> would be to remove the =:file …= header argument and specify the =set >>> output= within the gnuplot script itself? That should still generate the >>> .eps file. >>> >>> >> I may give this a try at work tomorrow... just tried the same file on my >> Mac at home (running the same linux setup) and it's working, though I still >> get a filename.eps and a filename-eps-converted-to.pdf output. It's just >> that the .eps on this computer is valid and viewable. >> >> I'll have to dig into this some more; perhaps comparing org versions and >> .emacs config files. >> >> I'm pulling from the org git repo and doing a make now on this computer >> as we speak. If it still works, I'll do the same at work tomorrow and see >> if that helps. >> >> > Fresh org pull, same file... no viable output. The =set output "test.eps"= > command with no :file header does not work. I get "code block produced no > output" in the minibuffer. > > Here's some things of interest... > -- Removing =set terminal...= and exporting via =:file test.png= works > -- Using =set terminal postscript= and =:file test.ps= works > -- Using =set terminal postscript eps enhanced= and =:file test.eps= does > *not* work > > What package provides the eps ability? Perhaps I removed something from my > system that I didn't intend to! > > Any suggestions on how to see what's going on? > > Shoot. It's geeqie. On a hunch, I opened the eps in gimp and it views fine. Something's wrong with my image viewer... False alarm; org/babel/gnuplot are working fine. John > > Thanks, > John > > >> >> Thanks for the input, >> John >> >> >> >>> Chris >>> >>> On Jan 5, 2012, at 3:54 PM, John Hendy wrote: >>> >>> I have the following gnuplot/babel block and for some reason the >>> resultant .eps file comes up broken but a corresponding version of it gets >>> converted to pdf somehow... what's going on? I stole an example just to >>> check and make sure it wasn't my gnuplot code: >>> http://t16web.lanl.gov/Kawano/gnuplot/intro/plotfunc-e.html >>> >>> ----- >>> #+begin_src gnuplot :file export.eps :exports results >>> reset >>> >>> set terminal postscript eps color enhanced 20 >>> >>> a=0.25 >>> b=0.02 >>> c=0.05 >>> d=0.1 >>> f(x)=c/((x-a)*(x-a)+b)+d/sqrt(x) >>> set xrange [0:1] >>> set yrange [0:4] >>> plot f(x) >>> >>> #+end_src >>> ----- >>> >>> I get a file export.eps which is broken and unreadable by geeqie. I get >>> a corresponding file called export-eps-converted-to.pdf that opens fine and >>> looks like it should. >>> >>> What am I doing incorrectly? >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> John >>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> Chris Malone (mal...@ucolick.org) >>> >>> Dept. of Astronomy and Astrophysics >>> UC Santa Cruz >>> 1156 High Street >>> Santa Cruz, CA 95064-1077 >>> >>> phone: 831-459-3809 >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> >> >
