Hello all, Should I be able to use @> in references to remote tables?
For example in the tables below I would expect the results table to show "cde" as the result of both formulas. #+TBLNAME: TEST1 |---+---| | a | f | | b | g | | c | h | | d | i | | e | j | |---+---| #+TBLNAME: RESULTS |--------------| | Formula test | |--------------| | cde | | abc | |--------------| #+TBLFM: @2$1='(concat remote(TEST1, @3$1..@5$1))::@3$1='(concat remote(TEST1, @3$1..@>$1)) Is there a syntax I should be using if I want to get all the entries in a table below a certain row without explicitly entering the number of the last row? Thanks in advance Phil Mason
