Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaz...@gmail.com> writes: > Hello, > > Jambunathan K <kjambunat...@gmail.com> writes: > >> Does the existing behaviour as captured in [[Side-by-Side images laid >> out by hand]] be preserved with new export driver? > > I'm not sure to get the syntax right, but in the new exporter, you can > see what is the next or previous element, along with its > properties. Thus, you can detect when two paragraphs are back to back, > if they have appropriate :attr_latex properties and if they are enclosed > in a parent center-block element. > > The check could be done at the paragraph level, and, if positive, > org-odt-paragraph could return the <draw:fram > draw:style....>...</draw:frame> string. > > Am I missing something?
On a related note, --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- * Example This is a single # some comment paragraph. This is another #+attr_odt: t paragraph. --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- if I parse the above buffer, I get #+begin_src emacs-lisp (paragraph (:begin 412 :end 431 :contents-begin 412 :contents-end 430 :post-blank 0) "This \nis \na\nsingle") (comment (:begin 431 :end 446 :value "# some comment\n" :post-blank 0)) (paragraph (:begin 446 :end 459 :contents-begin 446 :contents-end 456 :post-blank 2) "paragraph.") (paragraph (:begin 459 :end 477 :contents-begin 459 :contents-end 476 :post-blank 0) "This \nis \nanother") (paragraph (:begin 477 :end 502 :contents-begin 491 :contents-end 501 :post-blank 0 :attr_odt ("t")) "paragraph.") #+end_src I see that the new export engine treats comment and control lines as par breakers. The backends that are in production treats the first paragraph as but a single paragraph. There is already a way by which parbreaks can be introduced. Do you think there could be some useful behaviour achieved - side by side export of images came up in this thread - by not having commented elements introduce parbreaks. I am only brainstorming here. I hope the examples and use-case taken up here help steer our discussion in a meaningful manner. > Regards,