Ilya Shlyakhter <ilya_...@alum.mit.edu> writes: > On 3/27/2012 9:49 PM, John J Foerch wrote: >>>> These thoughts lead me to suggest that maybe org-log-note-headings is no >>>> longer sufficient to its original purpose, because extensions wish to >>>> parse state changes, but that blocks users from configuring the formats. >>>> Perhaps it is time to replace it with something that guarantees ability >>>> to parse. >> I have been experimenting with parsing the format-string to build a >> regexp to match the generated-strings. This approach depends upon the >> parsability of the expansions of each of the percent-codes. As concerns >> org-log-note-headings, %t, %T, %d, %D, %s, %S, and %u all have parseable >> expansions, as far as I can tell. I'm not sure about %U, but if the >> rest of the string is not too complicated, it shouldn't be a problem. >> Format-code flag, width, and precision add some complexity to the >> problem of generating regexps to match the codes, and I haven't done >> that bit yet. Overall I think this could be a very viable approach, and >> I'll paste my scraps of code below: >> >> ;;; parsing state changes >> ;;; > > Thanks a lot -- I also need the ability to parse state changes for an > extension I am writing. It'll be very useful if you could post the > final working version of your patch for this. > > thanks, > > ilya
Will do. -- John Foerch