Hi Michael, Michael Hannon <jm_han...@yahoo.com> writes:
> Here is the same table, but with the formulas spread across three different > lines: > > #+TBLNAME: test2 > | 1 | 2 | | > | 4 | 5 | | > | 7 | 8 | 9 | > #+TBLFM: @1$3='(+ 10 7) > #+TBLFM: @2$3='(+ 11 9) > #+TBLFM: @3$1=42 > > If I hit C-c C-c while the point is on the FIRST TBLFM line, I get: > > #+TBLNAME: test2 > | 1 | 2 | 17 | > | 4 | 5 | | > | 7 | 8 | 9 | > > This is what I expected. If I now proceed to hit C-c C-c while the point is > on the SECOND TBLFM line, I get: > > > #+TBLNAME: test2 > | 1 | 2 | 17 | > | 4 | 5 | | > | 7 | 8 | 9 | > > I.e., there is no change whatsoever. If I then hit C-c C-c while the point is > on the THIRD TBLFM line, I get: > > #+TBLNAME: test2 > | 1 | 2 | 17 | > | 4 | 5 | | > | 7 | 8 | 9 | > > I.e., again there is no change whatsoever. Yes -- I was fooled by the example in the article too. I confirm only the first formula line after the table can be applied with C-c C-c. > As I said above, I'm happy with the "::" solution and am happy to let this > topic drop, but I'm eager to expand my Org-mode skills. Please let me know > what I'm missing. Thanks for pointing at this, I'm expanding my org-table skills too! Best, -- Bastien
