Thorsten Jolitz <> writes:

> #+begin_src org
> *** TODO 
> ** TODO 
> * TODO
> #+end_src
> Is that a bug - or am I using the function wrongly?
> I would want the subheadings below the top-level
> heading. 

Answering my own question (by experimentation): 
When point is on the *, the subheading goes on top, when point is behind
the *, the subheading goes below the current heading. 

Not necesarily what I would have expected, but knowing it, it works.  


Reply via email to