Hello Andreas, Andreas Leha wrote: > it seems to me, that #+call lines in subtrees with the :noexport: tag > are evaluated. Is this intended?
I think that, at least, it's not a bug. I don't /think/ it has never been specified like that. But I still don't have a clear view of what is done, in which order: - processing macros - inhibiting "noexport" subtrees - evaluating code blocks (possibly with noweb calls) - etc. In fact, what you expect is that putting a tag ":noexport:" on a subtree would propagate the option ":eval no-export"[1] to all code blocks beneath it. That's the one which inhibits code block evaluation during export (but allow interactive evaluation). > In my opinion, these #+calls should not be evaluated. I really don't have any strong opinion about this, even if, without further thinking, I'd favor the same behavior as the one you expected. Best regards, Seb [1] Notice the different spelling: with or without the dash. -- Sebastien Vauban
