Hi Nick, Nick Dokos <nicholas.do...@hp.com> writes:
> Well, the non-interactiveness and the next day are because the four > items I marked were the last four items for that date, so after marking > them, the cursor happened to be on the date line for the next day, which > apparently is taken as an indication that I want things to be > rescheduled for that date, no questions asked. Not sure I like this > much. This implementation was to mimick the previous behavior we had with `k m' (to mark an entry) then `k s' (to schedule it to the date at point with no prompt.) I don't like having no prompt here too. I just changed the behavior so that there is *always* a prompt with `m m m B s' -- if the cursor is on a date, this date is the default time for the prompt, RET will reschedule to this date. > However, if I move the cursor off the date line before I issue the > bulk command, I get a date dialog, but it's a no-op: no matter what > I give it, things are rescheduled to today. Fixed. Thanks! -- Bastien
