Simon Thum <simon.t...@gmx.de> writes: > I see, it just seemed to me that org-contacts uses it for (seemingly) > good reasons and there is no replacement or deprecation. Is there > missing consensus on this syntax?
I don't think so. AFAIU this syntax was created to include diary entries without the overhead of generating the diary first. There are not meant to be used as a replacement for timestamps. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou
