Rainer M Krug <r.m.k...@gmail.com> writes: > On 23/11/12 00:17, Eric Schulte wrote: >> Rainer M Krug <r.m.k...@gmail.com> writes: >> >>> Hi >>> >>> I have in a document a definition of a projection, which is essentially a >>> text as follow: >>> >>> #+BEGIN_src +proj=aea +lat_1=-28.25 +lat_2=-29.75 +lat_0=29 +lon_0=30.75 >>> +x_0=0 +y_0=0 >>> +datum=WGS84 +units=m +no_defs #+END_src >>> >>> Now this does obviously not export, as the source block language is >>> missing. Is there a way >>> that I can get the same formating of the source in the exportes output but >>> without the syntax >>> highlighting? >>> >>> BEGIN_EXAMPLE END_EXAMPLE >>> >>> is similar, but I would like the block to be formated as the SRC blocks. >>> >> >> I bet "fundamental" would work, e.g., > > Yes, it does - works perfectly. Is this documented? >
Yes. Whatever language string is placed at the top of the source block will define the mode used for export and in-block editing. I believe that is documented. Cheers, > > Thanks, > > Rainer > >> >> #+begin_src fundamental +proj=aea +lat_1=-28.25 +lat_2=-29.75 +lat_0=29 >> +lon_0=30.75 +x_0=0 >> +y_0=0 +datum=WGS84 +units=m +no_defs #+end_src >> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Rainer >> > -- Eric Schulte http://cs.unm.edu/~eschulte
