Matt Price <mopto...@gmail.com> writes: > On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 7:44 PM, Alan L Tyree <alanty...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 06/12/12 11:22, Rasmus wrote: >>> >>> Andrew Hyatt <ahy...@gmail.com> writes: >>> >>>> This sounds like an interesting project. My advice is to make a few >>>> screenshots that give people an idea what you are working towards. >>>> Of course, they could be completely fake, but it would be helpful to >>>> understand for people like me who haven't used Scrivener. >>> >>> I would also like to see this. It sounds nice when I read your >>> description, but I still don't fully appreciate the idea. >>> >>> –Rasmus >>> >> I'm also very interested. I haven't used Scrivener -- what features do you >> see as making org a *way* better writing environment?
[...] > To start with I would like to just replicate this window structure, > because it keeps you focused on writing, while having the larger > structure available if you feel the need to flit around a bit. The > third screenshot shows a semi-fake, still very primitive version of > what I'd like to have. (I haven't figured out a good way to do the > metadata yet). I *really* like the idea of having a right-hand pane available showing properties around the current point -- it could include properties from the PROPERTIES drawer, from the structure returned by `org-element-property', text properties, and maybe properties of the current headline parent. I'm sort of envisioning what you get from the "inspect element" command in Firefox. For the left-hand pane, org-toc and org-panel in the contrib directory (or even the org-goto interface) might provide some inspiration. Ugh, sounds like a lot of work. E