Hi Henning, Henning Weiss <hdwe...@gmail.com> writes:
> I was wondering why this patch was reversed in master. I think the line didn't change since 4a49e40d but I might be wrong. > An updated version of the patch is attached, and a discussion of what > it does is below. Looks like the "updated" version is the same than the one you sent first: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2012-01/msg00938.html ... and there is an updated one in the same thread: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2012-01/msg01073.html Which one should I apply? Could you add a commit message with an Emacs changelog to your patch? Thanks! -- Bastien
