Tassilo Horn <t...@gnu.org> writes:

>> I've done the bisecting:
>>
>> 7684fbd6a227f0ad182661fd7eb17a9e13dc4695 is the first bad commit
>> commit 7684fbd6a227f0ad182661fd7eb17a9e13dc4695
>> Author: Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaz...@gmail.com>
>> Date:   Tue Jan 8 10:34:40 2013 +0100
>>
>>     Ignore `auto-fill-inhibit-regexp'
>
> Sorry for the noise, but I must have done something wrong during
> bisect.  The previous commit is also "bad", so Nicolas isn't the one
> to blame here.  I'll bisect again...

Ok, here's the new bisecting result, and that seems reasonable:

c8bfd50223d1a75d12d7f74571c24951592c56ec is the first bad commit
commit c8bfd50223d1a75d12d7f74571c24951592c56ec
Author: Bastien Guerry <b...@altern.org>
Date:   Mon Jan 7 16:12:52 2013 +0100

    org-agenda.el: New option `org-agenda-use-tag-inheritance'
    
    * org-agenda.el (org-search-view, org-agenda-get-todos)
    (org-agenda-get-timestamps, org-agenda-get-sexps)
    (org-agenda-get-progress, org-agenda-get-deadlines)
    (org-agenda-get-scheduled, org-agenda-get-blocks)
    (org-agenda-change-all-lines): Get local tags only.
    (org-agenda-use-tag-inheritance): New option.
    (org-agenda-finalize): When `org-agenda-use-tag-inheritance'
    is non-nil, possibly reset tags in the agenda buffer.
    (org-agenda-check-type): Enhance docstring.
    
    See the docstring of the new option for details.

:040000 040000 78b4635191f9aadf4fb1e4aaf4fce5c503e24ef6
cfc6f54ff9328ec0f338f2050b913ae7dfbb399b M      lisp

In the diff of that commit, I see a lot of changes like

-                 (setq tags (org-get-tags-at))
+                 (setq tags (org-get-tags-at nil t))

i.e., it used to show all tags (local and inherited), and now it's
explicitly said to display only local tags.

I've validated the result: with c8bfd50223d1a75d12d7f74571c24951592c56ec
tag inheritance is broken, with its predecessor babba02 it does work
again.

Bye,
Tassilo


Reply via email to