Tassilo Horn <t...@gnu.org> writes: >> I've done the bisecting: >> >> 7684fbd6a227f0ad182661fd7eb17a9e13dc4695 is the first bad commit >> commit 7684fbd6a227f0ad182661fd7eb17a9e13dc4695 >> Author: Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaz...@gmail.com> >> Date: Tue Jan 8 10:34:40 2013 +0100 >> >> Ignore `auto-fill-inhibit-regexp' > > Sorry for the noise, but I must have done something wrong during > bisect. The previous commit is also "bad", so Nicolas isn't the one > to blame here. I'll bisect again...
Ok, here's the new bisecting result, and that seems reasonable: c8bfd50223d1a75d12d7f74571c24951592c56ec is the first bad commit commit c8bfd50223d1a75d12d7f74571c24951592c56ec Author: Bastien Guerry <b...@altern.org> Date: Mon Jan 7 16:12:52 2013 +0100 org-agenda.el: New option `org-agenda-use-tag-inheritance' * org-agenda.el (org-search-view, org-agenda-get-todos) (org-agenda-get-timestamps, org-agenda-get-sexps) (org-agenda-get-progress, org-agenda-get-deadlines) (org-agenda-get-scheduled, org-agenda-get-blocks) (org-agenda-change-all-lines): Get local tags only. (org-agenda-use-tag-inheritance): New option. (org-agenda-finalize): When `org-agenda-use-tag-inheritance' is non-nil, possibly reset tags in the agenda buffer. (org-agenda-check-type): Enhance docstring. See the docstring of the new option for details. :040000 040000 78b4635191f9aadf4fb1e4aaf4fce5c503e24ef6 cfc6f54ff9328ec0f338f2050b913ae7dfbb399b M lisp In the diff of that commit, I see a lot of changes like - (setq tags (org-get-tags-at)) + (setq tags (org-get-tags-at nil t)) i.e., it used to show all tags (local and inherited), and now it's explicitly said to display only local tags. I've validated the result: with c8bfd50223d1a75d12d7f74571c24951592c56ec tag inheritance is broken, with its predecessor babba02 it does work again. Bye, Tassilo