Hello,

co...@online.de (Jonas Hörsch) writes:

> i just noticed, that although org-element properly parses the repeating
> information of an active-range :type timestamp, it is not able to
> interpret it again (unless the :raw-value is still present, of
> course).

Fixed. Thank you for the detailed report.


Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou

Reply via email to