On Sun Feb 10 2013 Bastien wrote: > > But it appears to me that this feature could use a > > more sophisticated regexp matcher. Note that the 5th and 6th line > > are not striked through. > > Because the space isn't allowed within +...+ fontified constructs.
There are spaces both between the 2nd and 3rd line, and between the 5th and 6th line. -- Possibly, the regexp matcher could distinguish in a smarter way between word constituents and no word constituents. > (setq org-fontify-emphasized-text nil) Thanks, I'll use that. > > The org info node on structural markup > > elements does not mention such a possibility. > > Mhh.. yes, I'll perhaps update the manual, or just add a Worg > FAQ for this. Why put this in a separate FAQ? Aren't the info pages the first source of information for such things? Roland
