Nick Dokos <nicholas.do...@hp.com> wrote:
> Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > ...
> > Thus, I suggest to announce that $ (both $ and $$, even though $$ don't
> > have problems /per se/) symbols for should be avoided. Then, in a year
> > or so, we can remove them completely from code base.
> >
>
> Agree. Also $$...$$ may not cause problems to org, but according to Lamport
> (see p. 233 of Lamport (2nd ed)) it does not work properly in LaTeX.
>
See also
http://www.tex.ac.uk/cgi-bin/texfaq2html?label=dolldoll
for some details.
Nick
