Hi, Rasmus wrote: >> Maybe we should write a user guide *before* further implementation >> steps. > > I agree. A "question zero" is whether we eventually want to have an > org-letter which could, in principle, output to something different > than scrlttr2.
That could be "isodoc" for which I have a bit of experience with. I'd enjoy to try and plug it in the current "org-letter" implementation. Best regards, Seb -- Sebastien Vauban
