Hallöchen! Bastien writes:
> Torsten Bronger <bron...@physik.rwth-aachen.de> writes: > >> - There is no way to set the line width besides setting Emacs >> margins, which is visually less appealing than before. (Minor >> problem.) > > Please report this to Emacs developers. In http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2010-05/msg00824.html Stefan Monnier says that he sees no need to add a set-wrap-width option. >> - Indentation in lists is essentially broken. I illustrate this >> by indenting this list as it now appears in my org-mode file. >> One can activate org-indent-mode but this is not the same as >> longlines-mode. Besides, I don't like the big indentations it >> creates for deeply nested content. > > `org-indent-mode' is fine for me here, it fixes the wrong _visual_ > indentation which results from using `visual-line-mode'. Yes, it fixes it for me, too. But my point is that I don't want to have indentation of the subtrees, only of the list items. This basically means that org-indent-mode isn't the solution I am looking for. Besides, setting org-indent-indentation-per-level to "0" triggers this error on startup: Warning (initialization): An error occurred while loading `/home/bronger/.emacs': Args out of range: [nil * ** *** **** ***** ****** ******* ******** ********* ********** *********** ************ ************* ************** *************** **************** ***************** ****************** ******************* ******************** nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil], -1 Should I report a bug? And, shouldn't visual-line-mode's behaviour that it doesn't respect the indentation of org-mode be considerd a bug, too? Tschö, Torsten. -- Torsten Bronger Jabber ID: torsten.bron...@jabber.rwth-aachen.de or http://bronger-jmp.appspot.com
