On 28.2.2013, at 09:39, Carsten Dominik <carsten.domi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 27.2.2013, at 16:22, Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaz...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Carsten Dominik <carsten.domi...@gmail.com> writes: >> >>> OK, I see that this is a bit less trivial then I thought, requires >>> that I study the ui interface a bit more. >> >> I think the only pieces of the UI involved are `org-export-dispatch' >> function and `org-export-dispatch-last-action' variable. >> >>> If you want to rush ahead and implement it let me know - otherwise >>> this will be a few days before I find the time. >> >> There's no hurry. It can wait a few days. > > OK, I pushed this change, maybe it is good if you have a brief look, Nicolas. > It was great fun and educational to study your very clear code. Sorry for following up on my own post. I forgot to mention that I did put in the restriction to make this work only if the export command is called in the same buffer. However, I am not checking if the cursor is in the same subtree - it seems to me that the behavior would become too unpredictable. Also, I have not yet documented the change in the manual, of course. - Carsten
