On 14.3.2013, at 23:32, Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello, > > Carsten Dominik <carsten.domi...@gmail.com> writes: > >> I propose the following patch to improve the automatic >> indentation of the backend definition macros in ox.el. >> >> - Carsten >> >> diff --git a/lisp/ox.el b/lisp/ox.el >> index c5b6d7c..31983b2 100644 >> --- a/lisp/ox.el >> +++ b/lisp/ox.el >> @@ -987,6 +987,7 @@ keywords are understood: >> ',export-block)) >> ;; Splice in the body, if any. >> ,@body))) >> +(put 'org-export-define-backend 'lisp-indent-function 1) >> >> (defmacro org-export-define-derived-backend (child parent &rest body) >> "Create a new back-end as a variant of an existing one. >> @@ -1078,6 +1079,7 @@ The back-end could then be called with, for example: >> ',export-block)) >> ;; Splice in the body, if any. >> ,@body))) >> +(put 'org-export-define-derived-backend 'lisp-indent-function 2) >> >> (defun org-export-backend-parent (backend) >> "Return back-end from which BACKEND is derived, or nil." >> @@ -5201,6 +5203,7 @@ and >> (message "Process '%s' exited abnormally" p)) >> (unless org-export-async-debug >> (delete-file ,,temp-file))))))))))))) >> +(put 'org-export-async-start 'lisp-indent-function 1) >> >> (defun org-export-add-to-stack (source backend &optional process) >> "Add a new result to export stack if not present already. > > Isn't it the default behaviour (see `declare' in definitions)? Indeed, apparently I had not loaded ox.el when I tried to reindent some code, and I am not used to using and seeing the declare form. Sorry for the noise. - Carsten
