I just pushed up a patch which should allow code blocks to find un-named results even when there are comment lines (such as #+options or #+attr_backend) between the code block and the results.
Hope this helps, John Hendy <jw.he...@gmail.com> writes: > On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 6:20 PM, Jay Kerns <gjkerns...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 6:21 PM, Nick Dokos <nicholas.do...@hp.com> wrote: >> >> [snip] >> >>> I think the best way to deal with problems like this is to name your code >>> blocks (and results blocks). >>> >> >> [snip] >> >> I can't speak for Li, but it works on my system and I like Nick's >> solution better than mine. > > This is my preferred syntax as well. This has come up before on the > list; essentially any #+options syntax before an un-named #+results > block will cause the results to be re-inserted. #+begin_center or any > #+attr_backend options result in the same duplicate insertion of > results. > > > Also, just in case it's not known, you don't have to manually name the > #+results block. Just create your babel block with a #+name: attribute > and when you run it with C-c C-c, a named #+result will automatically > be created. > > John > >> >> Cheers, >> >> -- >> Jay >> > -- Eric Schulte http://cs.unm.edu/~eschulte