Hello, Christian Moe <christian....@hf.uio.no> writes:
> The new ODT exporter sometimes, but not always fails to put footnotes in > Footnote style as expected. They are left in Text Body, which is wrong > (and surprisingly difficult to fix in LibreOffice). > > After a bit of trial and failure, it seems the error depends on the > scope of export: > > Exporting the whole buffer gives correct footnote style. > > Exporting a subtree only fails to give the correct style -- *unless* the > footnote is included in the subtree. In the example below, I actually > get a mix of stylesm depending on whether the footnote is defined in the > exported section or outside it. Org-mode is clearly able to find both > footnotes, and recognize them as footnotes, so I'm baffled at the > different styling. I see where the problem lies. In order to implement an appropriate fix, I need to know the answer of the following problem: In regular contents, paragraphs within centered blocks get the "OrgCenter" style. So, in the following example: Para 1 #+begin_center Para 2 #+end_center style for "Para 1" (resp. "Para 2") is "Text_20_body" (resp. "OrgCenter"). Now consider the following example where everything is located within a footnote definition: [fn:1] Para 1 #+begin_center Para 2 #+end_center "Para 1" obviously gets "Footnote" as style. I'm not sure about "Para 2". What is the appropriate style for it? Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou