Hello, Christian Moe <m...@christianmoe.com> writes:
> Nicolas Goaziou writes: >> Caveat: `org-html-table-tag' is now named >> `org-html-table-default-attributes' and expect a plist as its value. >> Also, a nil value will remove the property from the attributes. >> >> Could you test it and confirm this is now behaving in a desirable way? > > I've run some tests and confirm it works as I'd like it to. Thanks, I > really like this and I hope others like the plist syntax as well. Great. Thank you again. > Late thought, sorry: If we can have this plist syntax as a general rule, > perhaps we should nevertheless keep the :options tag just as a fallback, > to ease the transition for users with a lot of legacy attr_html lines? > It's easier and less catastrophe-prone to do a quick search/replace from > > : ^#\+attr_html: > > to > > : #+attr_html: :options > > than it is to automatically replace verbatim attribute code with plists, > especially if there are all sorts of html irregularities in there. I prefer not to mix the two methods as it would be fragile (e.g. what happens if an attribute is defined both outside and inside the :options keyword?). > PS. Though if everything is nice and conforming to xhtml, one should be > able to batch convert files from verbatim html attributes to plist syntax with > something like the following -- USE AT OWN RISK, NO WARRANTY IMPLIED: > > : perl -i.bak -pe 's/([a-z]+)=([\"\'])(.*?)\2/:\1 \2/g if /^#\+attr_html/i' > *.org Would you mind adding it to Worg section about the migration to Org 8.0? It would be quite useful. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou