Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaz...@gmail.com> writes:
> Is that OK with you?
I still resist this idea.
I would find it both cleaner and more useful for users to extend
`org-export-with-timestamps' with three choices:
'inactive-not-standalone
'active-not-standalone
'not-standalone
When set to 'not-standalone, it means export time-stamps except
"standone time-stamps", i.e. those who are alone on a line. That's
the set-up most users will want after t, it fits the habits that
Bernt has been describing, and it's useful for users who wants to
get rid of the planning-like active time-stamp right below the
headline.
Also, it's easier to explain users how to set this up (through
the docstring) than to explain why time-stamps are not removed in
tables with (setq org-export-with-timestamps nil).
--
Bastien
