On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Sebastien Vauban
<wxhgmqzgw...@spammotel.com> wrote:
> Eric Schulte wrote:
>> Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaz...@gmail.com> writes:
>>> John Hendy <jw.he...@gmail.com> writes:
>>>> On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 2:56 PM, Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaz...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> John Hendy <jw.he...@gmail.com> writes:
>>>>>
>>>>>> #+RESULTS:
>>>>>> #+BEGIN_org
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>> #+END_org
>>>>>
>>>>> This is wrong. We discussed it months ago on this ML and, IIRC, Babel
>>>>> should produce "#+begin_src org" blocks, not "#+begin_org". Org
>>>>> documentation specifies it too.
>>>>
>>>> "Wrong," as in =:wrap org= behavior is currently a bug? Or "wrong" in that
>>>> for my given use case, I shouldn't be using =:wrap org=?
>>>
>>> Wrong as is "the current behaviour is a bug". It is expected to produce
>>> "#+begin_src org" blocks. Its use case is to generate dead data:
>>
>> I disagree, the current behavior is *not* a bug. From the manual.
>>
>> ,----
>> | 14.8.2.23 ':wrap'
>> | .................
>> |
>> | The ':wrap' header argument is used to mark the results of source block
>> | evaluation. The header argument can be passed a string that will be
>> | appended to '#+BEGIN_' and '#+END_', which will then be used to wrap the
>> | results. If not string is specified then the results will be wrapped in
>> | a '#+BEGIN/END_RESULTS' block.
>> `----
>>
>> I think you're confusing ":results org" with ":wrap org".
>
> And it's even possible to use ":wrap SRC org" to get the same as ":results
> org"...
True, however I don't get the same output as I used to with this and
think it's essentially useless now. =#+begin_src org/end_src= used to
give me the equivalent of essentially a block of Org-mode syntax that
would be interpreted and parsed just as if it had no #+begin/end
around it. Now, it's output to LaTeX in \begin{verbatim} /
\end{verbatim}. It's treated like source code, not Org-mode text to be
exported.
=#+begin_src org= seems to be no different than =#+begin_example= or
=#+begin_src lang :exports code :eval no=
John
>
>> That said, I don't think there is ever a case when you would want to use
>> ":wrap org". The solution to the original question is to use ":results
>> drawer".
>
> Best regards,
> Seb
>
> --
> Sebastien Vauban
>
>
