Viktor Rosenfeld <listuse...@gmail.com> writes: >> Yeah, I guess it's true. Still, since foldmarks depends on which >> envelopes you have at hand it might make sense to have it accept a >> string. In lisp-terms a string is still t. On the other hand the >> current approach is consistent with your approach above so that's a >> merit. > > The more I think about it the more I agree that you should be able to > set any value of foldmarks. The only problem I see is that for other > boolean options one can use `t' whereas for foldmarks one would need to > use `true' (because `t' is a valid configuration value for foldmarks). > But as long as that's documented I see no problem. I will post a patch, > once Alan applies my previous patches.
I don't know the details of the exporter well enough on this detail, but perhaps it can be utilized that t ≠ "t"; if that's true in the exporter as well. In normal lisp (characterp "t") => t and (characterp t) nil. But I'm not sure if t would be transformed before being able to check. . . Thanks, Rasmus -- May the Force be with you
