On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 02:05:18AM -0700, Eric Abrahamsen wrote:
> Carsten Dominik <carsten.domi...@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > Hi Eric,
> >
> > thanks for the reply. OK, I am going with the patch for now, let's
> > push more thinking about HTML5 further down the line.
> >
> > Thanks for working this out!
>
> My pleasure, I hope I haven't stifled debate...
No you haven't. Rather, you have described my position much better than
i could.
+1
My additional 2 cents. For me, xhtml and polyglot html5 (xhtml
masquerading as html5) are my primary output. html4 (with its sgml
derived unclosed tags) is the anomaly. Going forward i could see
something like:
ox-html-base (incomplete backend)
|
------------
| |
ox-html4 ox-xhtml(5)
|
ox-html5-fancy (with the html5 specific tags)
rick
