John Hendy <[email protected]> writes:
> On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 12:22 PM, Vincent Beffara <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>> I tracked down an error about \iint already being defined to a clash
>>> between wasysym and amsmath. I brought in amsmath, but it appears that
>>> wasysym is an Org LaTeX export default package.
>>
>> Just put this in the LaTeX header before you load amsmath:
>>
>> \usepackage{savesym}
>> \savesymbol{iint}
>> \savesymbol{iiint}
>>
>
> Does this savewasysym's definition if iint instead of amsmath's? In
> the case that I actually use \iint (super unlikely, but not
> impossible), which package's is preferred?
>
The wasysym docs say that there should be no conflict, but that seems
to be wrong: ISTR multiple instances of this conflict.
If you prefer the amsmath integral signs over the wasysym ones, then
probably the best thing to do is to load wasysym with the
``nointegrals'' option:
\usepackage[nointegrals]{wasysym}
This can be done permanently by customizing
org-latex-default-packages-alist and adding the option to the wasysym
entry.
--
Nick
