On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 6:48 AM, Rüdiger Sonderfeld <ruedi...@c-plusplus.de> wrote: > Rasmus <rasmus <at> gmx.us> writes: > >> >> Rüdiger Sonderfeld <ruediger <at> c-plusplus.de> writes: >> >> > I've started writing BibELTeX as an alternative to =ox-bibtex.el=. >> > >> > https://github.com/ruediger/bibeltex >> >> Would you consider providing a test file showing off its features? > > I added a file test/example.org. Put bibeltex.el somewhere in your load-path > and require it. This should be enough to make it work (use unload-feature to > remove it again). > > You can then export the document to any format you like. Good test case is > using org-mode export (ox-org.el).
Thank you for this, I've been waiting for this capability a long time. I look forward to giving it a more through test! Best, Ista > >> I'm skeptical but probably it is 'cause I've misunderstood something! >> Someone put a lot of thought into writing e.g. biblatex or >> odt-bibliographies. Surely(?) we would want to leverage upon those >> and only have org-support insofar as serving some backend-specific >> parser enough information to do its work? > > Certainly. BibELTeX is designed to do this. For LaTeX export it just > generates the corresponding LaTeX instructions (can be adopted even for > biblatex). > > But except for LaTeX there doesn't seem to be a real support for bibliography. > It can be simulated for html using bibtex2html (ox-bibtex.el). But even that > is not compatible with biber/biblatex. That's the reason behind BibELTeX. > > Regards > >
