Jambunathan K <[email protected]> writes:
>> I understand. You can still use ox-bibtex.el for now, and just ignore
>> all the "[[cite:...]]" part.
>
> Each citation processor should reside in it's own file. So ox-jabref.el
> is the right place for my changes.
LaTeX and HTML processors already reside in ox-bibtex.el. If you want to
create a new file, so be it, but try at least to require ox-bibtex and
use existing accessors and predicates to maintain compatibility.
> It seems that you are not interested in introducing ox-cite.el or a
> make-shift `citation-reference' element.
I don't know what led you to this conclusion.
I'm very much interested in supporting bibliographies from Org. I also
know it will require to implement a new citation object in the process.
I'm just pointing out two things:
- ox-bibtex will have to be implemented differently (e.g., no more
defadvices). So, it's not just about moving ox-bibtex into another
directory.
- before discussing (again) citations syntax, we must ensure that this
is a realistic goal. IOW we need a proof of concept for, at least,
every major back-end (including ASCII).
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
